This will accelerate species loss as well as threatening food and water security, says the report. Current plans for reducing carbon dioxide emissions to net-zero to limit climate change rely heavily on bioenergy, which requires a lot of land. The problem isn’t just our focus on economic growth regardless of the impact on the natural world. In fact, as of 2016, half the signatory countries hadn’t yet drawn up plans on how to meet the targets. All countries except the US have ratified the 1992 UN Convention of Biodiversity and are supposed to be conserving biodiversity and promoting its sustainable use.ĭespite this, more than 80 per cent of the agreed international targets for 2020 will not be met, says the report. “I’m optimistic that this will make a difference.” Bioenergy threatīut the challenge is immense. “Good knowledge is absolutely essential for good governance,” says Watson, who chaired the IPCC from 1997 to 2002. The hope is that it will lead to the same pressure for action as the latest scientific report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), on limiting warming to 1.5☌. The aim of the report, by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), is to provide an authoritative scientific basis for international action. It also says that where land is owned or managed by indigenous peoples and local communities, there has been less destruction and sometimes none at all. Read more: Is life on Earth really at risk? The truth about the extinction crisisīut we can still turn things around, the report says. “Nature can be conserved, restored and used sustainably while simultaneously meeting other global societal goals through urgent and concerted efforts fostering transformative change,” it states.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |